Skip to main content

Table 1 Demographic, geographic, health, and corrections characteristics of people with an opioid use disorder diagnosis released from provincial prisons between Jan 1 2015- Dec 29 2018 (N = 13,380 releases), by stimulant use disorder diagnosis

From: Stimulant use disorder diagnosis and opioid agonist treatment dispensation following release from prison: a cohort study

 

Total releases

N(%)

N = 13,380

Stimulant use disorder diagnosis

N(%)

N = 4963

No stimulant use disorder diagnosis

N(%)

N = 8417

P value

Sex

 Female

1625(12.15)

768(47.26)

857(52.74)

 < 0.001

 Male

11,755(87.85)

4195(35.69)

7560(64.31)

 

Age

  < 30

5927 (44.30)

2151(36.29)

3776(63.71)

0.092

 30–39

5155(38.53)

1981(38.43)

3174(61.57)

 

 40–49

1895(14.16)

684(36.09)

1211(63.91)

 

  >  = 50

403(3.01)

147(36.48)

256(63.52)

 

Health Authority

 Unknown

253(1.89)

5(1.98)

248(98.02)

 < 0.001

 Interior

1608(12.02)

550(34.20)

1058(65.80)

 

 Northern

824(6.16)

383(46.48)

441(53.52)

 

 Vancouver Coastal

3089(23.09)

1584(51.28)

1505(48.72)

 

 Vancouver Island

1673(12.50)

444(26.54)

1229(73.46)

 

 Fraser

5933(44.34)

1997(33.66)

3936(66.34)

 

Mental Illness diagnosis prior to release

 Yes

8685 (64.91)

4248(48.91)

4437(51.09)

 < 0.001

 No

4695(35.09)

715(15.23)

3980(84.77)

 

Prior number of incarcerations (only back to 2015) at time of releasea

 0

3969(29.67)

1111(27.99)

2858(72.01)

 < 0.001

 1

2581(19.29)

810(31.38)

1771(68.62)

 

 2 + 

6830(51.05)

3042(44.54)

3788(55.46)

 

Year of release

 2015

2533(18.93)

834(32.93)

1699(67.07)

 < 0.001

 2016

3100(23.17)

1094(35.29)

2006(64.71)

 

 2017

3863(28.87)

1442(37.33)

2421(62.67)

 

 2018

3884(29.03)

1593(41.04)

2291(58.99)

 
  1. aDistribution of prior incarcerations Mean: 2.86 (SD: 3.99), Median = 2.00, [IQR = 0.00,4.00] Range:0–49). The “unknown” category for health authority represents cases for which health authrortity of residence data were missing. These records were retained in the analysis in their own “unkown” level of the health authority variable. Data are presented at the release level, not the person level