Skip to main content

Naloxone availability in independent community pharmacies in Georgia, 2019

Abstract

Background

Increasing the availability of naloxone among people who use opioids, and friends and family of past and present people who use opioids is a vitally important mission to reduce the occurrence of opioid-related overdose deaths. The purpose of this study was to determine the availability of naloxone in independent community pharmacies in Georgia. Secondary objectives include determining pharmacists’ knowledge regarding the standing order and ability to counsel regarding naloxone.

Methods

A cross-sectional study using a secret shopper approach with phone contact was conducted over a period of 10 months. The study was population based and was conducted at all independent pharmacies in the state of Georgia. All independent community pharmacies in the state of Georgia were contacted and asked the naloxone questions with a 96% response rate (n = 520).

Results

Five hundred fifty-eight independent community pharmacies were called, with a 96% response rate (n = 520 pharmacies). Two hundred-twenty pharmacies reported having naloxone in stock. Of the 335 pharmacists asked, 174 (51.9%) incorrectly said that a prescription was required. The mean (SD) cash price was $148.02 (27.40), with a range of $0 to $300. Of 237 pharmacists asked who had naloxone in stock or who stated they could get naloxone in stock, 212 stated that they could demonstrate how to use it, 8 stated they could not, and 17 said that they possibly could or were unsure how to use it.

Conclusions

This study provided insight into the limited availability of naloxone at independent community pharmacies in Georgia after the standing order was issued. The majority of pharmacists at independent pharmacies in Georgia were not using the publicly available state naloxone standing order. Additionally, the low availability of naloxone and its high cost for uninsured individuals are significant structural barriers for reducing opioid-related mortality.

Background

The opioid crisis claims more lives in the United States (US) each year [1]. Since 1999, nearly 841,000 people have died due to a drug overdose, with approximately 70% of these drug overdose deaths involving an opioid in 2019 [2]. The availability of naloxone, an opioid antagonist which rapidly reverses the effects of an opioid-induced respiratory depression, is a first line of defense in countering the incidence of opioid-related overdose deaths [3]. A single administration of a nasal spray or intramuscular injection of naloxone quickly competes for binding sites on opioid receptors within the nervous system, potentially saving an overdose victim’s life. Some people who use opioids may require a second or multiple doses of naloxone to reverse an overdose event [4]. Intranasal administration is an ideal alternative to the intramuscular injection route because it takes less skill for a layperson and there is no risk of a needlestick injury [3]. Having naloxone on hand is useful for people who take high doses of opioid pain medications, people who use opioid medications along with benzodiazepines, and people who use opioids not as prescribed by a doctor or illicit opioid medications or substances alike in order to reduce the risk of overdose mortality [5]. In 2017, then Surgeon General Jerome Adams encouraged widespread awareness of “knowing how to use naloxone and keeping it within reach [to] save a life” as a key part of the public health response to the opioid epidemic [6].

Increasing the availability of naloxone among people who use opioids, and friends and family of past and present people who use opioids is a vitally important mission to reduce the occurrence of opioid-related overdose deaths [5]. However, barriers to naloxone access are common due to issues such as expense [7], lack of awareness, lack of education [8], and stigma [9, 10]. Many studies have found that increased public awareness and increased pharmacist knowledge and training would be beneficial for increasing access to naloxone and potentially reducing opioid-related deaths [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. Pharmacists are well positioned to identify patients on high opioid dosages who would benefit from having naloxone on hand, to dispense naloxone, and to counsel patients accurately on its usage and overdose signs and symptoms [10, 14, 15, 18, 20]. Recent policies passed by the American Pharmacists Association House of Delegates “supports access to third-party prescriptions for opioid reversal agents”; “supports the education for pharmacists … [on] the appropriate use of opioid reversal agents in overdose”; and “supports the pharmacist role in … providing education about the proper use of opioid reversal agents to prevention opioid-related deaths due to overdose.” [21]

All 50 states have mechanisms by which pharmacists can directly dispense naloxone to patients without a prescription from a physician, although specific access conditions vary by state [22,23,24]. Forty-two states as well as the District of Columbia allow the purchase of naloxone without the requirement of a prescription from a primary healthcare provider [5, 20]. A 2020 study found that adequate funding and staffing of local health departments and pharmacies, especially those in US counties with high rates of opioid overdose deaths, would be beneficial in supporting implementation of naloxone kit distribution and other opioid-related initiatives [8]. Studies in states that currently have standing orders, or orders in place that allow pharmacist to dispense naloxone to persons without prescriptions, have found a variety of availability of naloxone in retail community pharmacies. Previous studies have reported a wide range of the percentages of pharmacies contacted that reported having naloxone in stock, with some as low as 23.5% [25] and other as high as 97.7% [26] and many falling somewhere between [13, 14, 27,28,29,30,31].

Naloxone is available for purchase without a prescriber encounter in the state of Georgia under a standing order [32]. This standing order’s purpose is to “facilitate the widest possible availability of naloxone to ensure that family members, friends, co-workers, first responders, schools, harm reduction organizations and any other person or entities are in a position to provide assistance to a person experiencing an opioid related overdose through the timely administration of the opioid antagonist naloxone” [33]. The standing order for naloxone includes pre-filled syringes (nasal and intramuscular), intranasal liquids, intramuscular injection solutions, and auto-injectors. Previous research on naloxone access in Georgia examined a random sampling of pharmacies where the callers self-identified as researchers [34], and has explored naloxone access in rural community pharmacies [35, 36]. This project contributes a full census of independent community pharmacies in Georgia using a secret shopper method to mimic patient and provider interactions. This project aimed to assess the absolute and relative availability of naloxone in both urban and rural independent community pharmacies as well as pharmacists’ knowledge regarding the standing order and their ability to provide counsel on the medication.

Methods

Mercer University’s Institutional Review Board deemed the study to be exempt for the need for informed consent because no patient data were used. Researchers obtained a list of licensed, community pharmacies from the Georgia State Board of Pharmacy and verified it for accuracy (i.e., to ensure no pharmacies were excluded, pharmacies were still in business, and verification of contact information) by conducting an internet and directory search of each zip code in the state. Independent pharmacies were defined as having fewer than four total locations [37]. The list was used to contact each independent community pharmacy. Trained researchers, including the authors and student researchers, used novel “secret shopper” methodology to call all independent pharmacies in Georgia posing as unidentified customers inquiring about the availability of naloxone at that pharmacy. This approach has been previously used in other studies accessing the availability of naloxone at pharmacies [31, 38]. One form of naloxone, a nasal spray, is FDA-approved and can be easily administered. The brand name for naloxone nasal spray, Narcan, was used to ask for the product as public recognition of the brand name is higher than the generic. Posing as patients (i.e. “secret shoppers”), researchers followed a script as they spoke to pharmacists to inquire about the availability of naloxone nasal spray at that location on the day the call was placed (Table 1). Because of dialect variation, we tried to ensure dialect concordance by having researchers with southern style accents call pharmacies located in counties whose residents are likely to have accents (i.e. counties that did not have urban or suburban cores). At the beginning of the call, researchers asked to speak with the pharmacist, and was insistent on speaking only to the pharmacist. If the pharmacist was not available, researchers asked for call backs or times the pharmacist will be available for the call. There was a maximum of three attempts for each pharmacy, with a one-week cool down period. If after three calls and the researchers could not speak to the pharmacist, they were not called again. During the call, if the pharmacist told the researcher that it was not in stock, the researcher asked where else it might be available. If the pharmacist stated that it was in stock, the researcher then asked for the retail price without insurance or any coupons applied, whether there was a less expensive alternative to the medication, and what the alternative’s price would be. Finally, researchers asked pharmacists if a prescription was required to obtain the medication. Data were collected and documented using Excel spreadsheet software version 2016 (Microsoft Corp) and SPSS statistical software version 25 (IBM Corp). Calls were placed between May 2019 and February 2020. Data analysis was performed June to July 2020.

Table 1 Telephone Responses - Accessibility of Narcan Under the Standing Order by Independent, Community Pharmacists in Georgia (N = 520)a

Results

All 558 independent, community pharmacies were called, with a 96% response rate (n = 520 pharmacies; Fig. 1). Nonresponsive pharmacies included pharmacies that were going out of business (e.g. closing soon) or pharmacies that did not answer the call. Two hundred-twenty pharmacies (42.3%; 95% CI, 38.0–46.7%) reported having Narcan in stock (Table 1). Those pharmacists were then asked whether a prescription was necessary for purchase. Some pharmacists who did have Narcan stocked stayed on the phone so that further questions were able to be answered. Of the 335 pharmacists asked, 135 (40.3%; 95% CI, 35.0–45.8%) correctly responded in stating that a prescription was not necessary, 174 (51.9%; 95% CI, 46.4–57.4%) said that a prescription was required, 15 (4.5%; 95% CI, 2.5–7.3%) were unsure, and 11 (3.3%; 95% CI, 1.7–5.8%) said that a prescription was required in some situations. Of the 118 pharmacists who reported no Narcan in stock, 66 (55.9%; CI, 46.5–65.0%) also stated that individuals need a prescription to get Narcan. For those 216 pharmacists who reported having Narcan in stock, nearly half (49.5%; CI, 42.7–56.4%) also responded that a prescription was needed (Table 2). Some pharmacists who reported not having Narcan in stock still answered other questions in the guide, while others declined to answer additional questions.

Fig. 1
figure1

shows the flow of recruitment and inclusion and exclusion criteria

Table 2 Comparison of prescription requirement response by Narcan availability

Pharmacists were also asked to give a cash quote for Narcan, meaning the cost without any discounts or insurance applied. The mean (standard deviation) cash price was $148.02 (27.40), with a range of $0 to $300. One pharmacist stated that their pharmacy does not charge for naloxone and will give it to anyone that requires the medication. Pharmacists were also asked if they could show the caller how to use the medication. Of 237 pharmacists asked who had naloxone in stock or who stated they could get naloxone in stock, 212 (89.5%; 95% CI, 84.8–93.1%) stated that they could, 8 (3.4%; 95% CI, 1.5–6.5%) stated they could not, and 17 (7.2%; 95%CI, 4.2–11.2%) said that they possibly could or were unsure how to do it. For pharmacists that reported that they did not have the medication in stock (n = 283, 54%), callers asked to be referred elsewhere to purchase the product. Of these, 130 (45.9%; 95% CI, 40.0–51.9%) specifically named a chain store; 77 (27.2%; 95% CI, 22.1–32.8%) gave a vague response such as “another nearby pharmacy should have it” or suggesting that the caller “call around”; 52 (18.4%; 95% CI, 14.0–23.4%) stated that they were unaware of another pharmacy that would have the medication in stock; 20 (7.1%; 95% CI, 4.4–10.7%) referred callers to another specific independent retail pharmacy; and 4 (1.4%; 95% CI, 0.4–3.6%) pharmacists offered to order the product to their store.

Discussion

The results of the secret shopper study confirm that structural factors at the pharmacy level are a major barrier to increasing naloxone access and thus reducing mortality from the opioid epidemic in Georgia. The researchers found that, despite the standing order originally passed in January of 2017, less than half of independent community pharmacies in Georgia stock Narcan. Further, the results show that there is a considerable knowledge gap in regards to the naloxone standing order in Georgia: 59.5%of pharmacists incorrectly answering the question regarding obtaining naloxone without a prescription;10.5% of pharmacists in independent community pharmacies in Georgia do not feel comfortable providing counseling regarding naloxone’s use; and 43.0% of pharmacists gave vague answers or were unsure where a patient could obtain naloxone should they not have it in stock. Interestingly despite having the drug in stock, almost half of pharmacists still claimed that a prescription was required to dispense the drug (Table 2). These results underscore that provider under-education continues to be a barrier for adequate access to naloxone. Because of naloxone’s ability to save lives, it is imperative that pharmacists are made aware of its benefits and the laws surrounding its dispensing [5].

The richness of the data is generated by the fact that independent community pharmacies are not necessarily connected to one another; i.e., it is not likely to have multiple pharmacies respond in an extremely similar way. While a large chain may adhere to a corporate policy regarding the stocking and dispensing of Narcan and pharmacists are provided with standardized time sensitive training, there is generally no such widespread policy among independent pharmacies. Thus, calls to independent community pharmacies are better described as evaluations of pharmacists’ knowledge than of large corporations’ policies. Data are made still more robust by the variety in geographic location of the pharmacies.

Pharmacists who work in community settings are in an especially useful position in helping patients access naloxone as they are one of the most accessible healthcare professionals and may be able to identify patients using high dose equivalents of opioids who are good candidates for naloxone [39]. However, some independent community pharmacists display a lack of understanding of the proper counseling points associated with dispensing naloxone to people who use opioids [39, 40]. Furthermore, very few (1.4%) pharmacists spontaneously offered to order the prescription for the caller when asked where else to find the drug. While a small proportion, this willingness to secure the medication for potential patients highlights the importance of community pharmacists as gatekeepers for individuals who need access to the medication [36].

Pharmacists dispensing naloxone, with or without a prescription, should not assume that the patients have been given any proper training or counseling about its use [20]. Our study shows findings that having a naloxone standing order in place may not be as beneficial as intended given the lack of knowledge by the people who distribute the medication.

Additionally, cost may be a prohibitive factor for uninsured patients. The average cash price at the interviewed Georgia pharmacies currently stocking naloxone was $148.02, which is comparable to the national average of $150 [41]. As the average median annual household income in Georgia in 2018 is $55,679 [42], this may be viewed as a nonessential item for uninsured individuals in lower income brackets. This is particularly relevant, given that individuals who die by opioid overdose tend to be uninsured and of a lower socioeconomic status [43]. While people who use opioids who need access to naloxone come from all points of the socioeconomic spectrum, this additional burden could be exacerbating existing health disparities for these already underserved groups. Therefore, future studies should further investigate cost as a structural barrier to naloxone use for uninsured, as well as individuals with coverage through state-based programs (Medicaid) or commercial payers. Additionally, the impact of state-level policies to reduce its cost for uninsured individuals, as providing naloxone to people who use opioids has been shown to be a cost-effective practice [44].

Limitations of this study include the lack of information gathered from each pharmacy. Callers did not collect information about the pharmacists themselves in terms of their age, gender, or experience working as a pharmacist in a independent community environment. Age or time since graduation may affect the results, as recently graduated pharmacists are more likely to have had naloxone training as a part of their didactic curriculum. Recent guidance from the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacies emphasizes the importance of educating students to address the public health crisis of opioid abuse, including expanding naloxone awareness and use [45]. Callers also did not ask whether naloxone is generally stocked; it is possible that some stores normally stock it but were sold out on the day the call was placed. Also, callers only completed calls with one pharmacist, not every pharmacist on staff. It is possible that different pharmacists may have varying levels of awareness and knowledge regarding naloxone, naloxone education has been a consistent part of pharmacy curriculum for student pharmacists and state-level CE for practicing, licensed pharmacists. However,due to the secret shopper methodology, we deemed pharmacies to be “complete” with data collection once the call was completed. Furthermore, callers only asked about the specific form of naloxone, Narcan, the intranasal spray. The other forms of naloxone covered in Georgia’s standing order, including intramuscular injections and auto-injectors, were not part of the callers’ questions. Pharmacists may have only responded regarding the availability of the specific formulation of naloxone. However, some pharmacists would offer other forms of naloxone when asked about Narcan.

There are other factors impacting naloxone acquisition and distribution that are not considered in this study. In particular, the social stigma surrounding naloxone usage, people who use opioids, and opioid use disorder may prevent someone from trying to obtain naloxone for themselves or for emergencies for others [9, 10]. Additionally, media coverage influences the public opinion of naloxone [46]. Pharmacists’ perceptions of naloxone distribution may also be skewed, and would therefore directly impact the potential availability of naloxone at independent pharmacies. Furthermore, the depth and breadth of counseling provided by those respective pharmacists may be impacted.

Future studies should address these limitations to provide a more complete picture of the barriers to naloxone access. The pharmacists who indicated that a prescription was required were not using the publicly available state naloxone standing order. This may be due to a lack of awareness or the decisions to not use the standing order, which could be explored further. Previous work has highlighted the need for additional educational programs for pharmacists to inform them of state law and policies [47]. Future studies should also analyze how to more effectively educate pharmacists regarding naloxone use, and how distribution affects overall use and distribution in the state. A recent study from Texas showed the positive impact of student-led academic detailing on improving pharmacists’ willing to dispense naloxone and increasing naloxone availability from community pharmacies [48].

Conclusions

Despite its limitations, this study provided the first insight into the availability of naloxone at all independent community pharmacies in Georgia after the standing order was issued. It is clear that the availability of naloxone in Georgia’s independent community pharmacies is limited. The finding that a majority of pharmacists at independent community pharmacies in Georgia were not using the publicly available state naloxone standing order presents a barrier to access and may also contribute to the infrequency of independent pharmacies stocking naloxone. Additionally, the low availability of naloxone and its high cost for uninsured individuals are significant structural barriers for reducing opioid-related mortality. These findings should motivate policymakers and healthcare professionals in Georgia to increase education regarding naloxone prescribing laws and practices at the community pharmacy level and improve the availability and affordability of naloxone in order to make it more readily available to the general public.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

US:

United States

References

  1. 1.

    Opioid Abuse and Dependence. Accessed September 29, 2020. https://www.dynamed.com/condition/opioid-abuse-and-dependence

  2. 2.

    Drug Overdose Deaths | Drug Overdose | CDC Injury Center. Published March 25, 2021. Accessed 15 June 2021. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/data/statedeaths.html

  3. 3.

    National Institute on Drug Abuse. Naloxone DrugFacts. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Published June 1, 2021. https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/drugfacts/naloxone. Accessed 17 Aug 2021.

  4. 4.

    Understanding Naloxone Standing Orders Is Vital. Accessed 29 Sept 2020. https://www.pharmacytimes.com/publications/issue/2018/november2018/understanding-naloxone-standing-orders-is-vital

  5. 5.

    Increases in Drug and Opioid Overdose Deaths — United States, 2000–2014. Accessed 29 Sept 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6450a3.htm

  6. 6.

    General O of the S. U.S. Surgeon General’s Advisory on Naloxone and Opioid Overdose. HHS.gov. Published April 3, 2018. Accessed 15 June 2021. https://www.hhs.gov/surgeongeneral/priorities/opioids-and-addiction/naloxone-advisory/index.html

  7. 7.

    Coleman AP. Cost-Effectiveness of Distributing Naloxone to Heroin Users for Lay Overdose Reversal: Coffin PO, Sullivan SD. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:1–9. Journal of Emergency Medicine. 2013;44(5):1057. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2013.03.002

  8. 8.

    Naloxone without a prescription » Georgia Pharmacy Association. Accessed 29 Sept 2020. https://www.gpha.org/naloxone/

  9. 9.

    Perry BL, Pescosolido BA, Krendl AC. The unique nature of public stigma toward non-medical prescription opioid use and dependence: a national study. Addiction. 2020;115(12):2317-26. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15069.

  10. 10.

    Green TC, Case P, Fiske H, et al. Perpetuating stigma or reducing risk? Perspectives from naloxone consumers and pharmacists on pharmacy-based naloxone in 2 states. J Am Pharmac Assoc. 2017;57(2, Supplement):S19–S27.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2017.01.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Egan KL, Foster SE, Knudsen AN, Lee JGL. Naloxone availability in retail pharmacies and neighborhood inequities in access. Am J Prev Med. 2020;58(5):699–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2019.11.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Graves RL, Andreyeva E, Perrone J, Shofer FS, Merchant RM, Meisel ZF. Naloxone availability and pharmacy staff knowledge of standing order for naloxone in Pennsylvania pharmacies. J Addict Med. 2019;13(4):272–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000000492.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Guadamuz JS, Alexander GC, Chaudhri T, Trotzky-Sirr R, Qato DM. Availability and cost of naloxone nasal spray at pharmacies in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2017. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(6):e195388. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.5388.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Thornton JD, Lyvers E, Scott V, Ginger G, Dwibedi N. Pharmacists’ readiness to provide naloxone in community pharmacies in West Virginia. J Am Pharmac Assoc. 2017;57(2, Supplement):S12–S18.e4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2016.12.070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Thakur T, Frey M, Chewning B. Pharmacist roles, training, and perceived barriers in naloxone dispensing: a systematic review. J Am Pharmac Assoc. 2020;60(1):178–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2019.06.016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Naloxone Prescriptions Among Commercially Insured Individuals at High Risk of Opioid Overdose | Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology | JAMA Network Open | JAMA Network. Accessed 29 Sept 2020. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/article-abstract/2732332

  17. 17.

    Meyerson BE, Agley JD, Davis A, Jayawardene W, Hoss A, Shannon DJ, et al. Predicting pharmacy naloxone stocking and dispensing following a statewide standing order, Indiana 2016. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018;188:187–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.03.032.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Bakhireva LN, Bautista A, Cano S, Shrestha S, Bachyrycz AM, Cruz TH. Barriers and facilitators to dispensing of intranasal naloxone by pharmacists. Subst Abus. 2018;39(3):331–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2017.1391924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Opioid overdose prevention through pharmacy-based naloxone prescription program: Innovations in health care delivery: Substance Abuse: Vol 38, No 1. Accessed 29 Sept 2020. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08897077.2016.1184739

  20. 20.

    Thornton JD, Anyanwu P, Tata V, Rawwad TA, Fleming ML, et al. Pharmacy Practice. 2020;18(1):1682. https://doi.org/10.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1682.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    APhA Policy Manual | American Pharmacists Association. Accessed 15 June 2021. https://aphanet.pharmacist.com/policy-manual?is_sso_called=1

  22. 22.

    Feuerstein-Simon R, Lowenstein M, Sharma M, Dupuis R, Marti XL, Cannuscio CC. Local health departments and the implementation of evidence-based policies to address opioid overdose mortality. Subst Abus 2020;0(0):1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2019.1709250.

  23. 23.

    Hill LG, Reveles KR, Evoy KE. State-level approaches to expanding pharmacists’ authority to dispense naloxone may affect accessibility. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(10):1442–3. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3653.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Abouk R, Pacula RL, Powell D. State-level approaches to expanding pharmacists’ authority to dispense naloxone may affect accessibility—reply. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(10):1443. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.3646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Puzantian T, Gasper JJ. Provision of naloxone without a prescription by California pharmacists 2 years after legislation implementation. JAMA. 2018;320(18):1933–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.12291.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Wu C, Brown T, Moreno JL. Access to naloxone at community pharmacies under the Massachusetts statewide standing order. J Am Pharmac Assoc. 2020;60(4):647–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2019.11.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Evoy KE, Hill LG, Groff L, Mazin L, Carlson CC, Reveles KR. Naloxone accessibility without a prescriber encounter under standing orders at community pharmacy chains in Texas. JAMA. 2018;320(18):1934–7. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.15892.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hill LG, Loera LJ, Evoy KE, Renfro ML, Torrez SB, Zagorski CM, et al. Availability of buprenorphine/naloxone films and naloxone nasal spray in community pharmacies in Texas, USA. Addiction. 2021;116(6):1505–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15314.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Eldridge LA, Agley J, Meyerson BE. Naloxone availability and dispensing in Indiana pharmacies 2 years after the implementation of a statewide standing order. J Am Pharmac Assoc. 2020;60(3):470–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2019.11.024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lozo KW, Nelson LS, Ramdin C, Calello DP. Naloxone deserts in NJ cities: sociodemographic factors which may impact retail pharmacy naloxone availability. J Med Toxicol. 2019;15(2):108–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13181-019-00700-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Jimenez DE, Singer MR, Adesman A. Availability of naloxone in pharmacies and knowledge of pharmacy staff regarding dispensing naloxone to younger adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2019;65(5):698–701. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.07.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Abouk R, Pacula RL, Powell D. Association between state Laws facilitating pharmacy distribution of naloxone and risk of fatal overdose. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(6):805–11. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0272.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Georgia Department of Public Health. Standing Order for Prescription of Naloxone for Overdose Prevention.; 2017. Accessed 12 Aug 2019. https://gbp.georgia.gov/document/standing-order-naloxone-june-29-2018/download

  34. 34.

    Stone RH, Hur S, Young HN. Assessment of naloxone availability in Georgia community pharmacies. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2020;60(2):357–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2019.11.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Nguyen JL, Gilbert LR, Beasley L, Brooks JJ Jr, Elliott J, Smalley KB, et al. Availability of naloxone at rural Georgia pharmacies, 2019. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(2):e1921227. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.21227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gilbert L, Warren J, Smalley K, Elliott J, Nguyen J. A qualitative analysis of pharmacists’ responses to naloxone inquiries in rural Georgia. Prev Med Rep. 2020;20:101198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101198.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    American Pharmacists Association. Indepedent Community Pharmacy. Published online 2013. Accessed August 9, 2019. https://www.pharmacist.com/sites/default/files/files/Profile_16_Independent_SDS_FINAL_090307.pdf

  38. 38.

    Contreras J, Baus C, Brandt C, Witry M, Peters J, Evoy KE. Pharmacist counseling when dispensing naloxone by standing order: A secret shopper study of 4 chain pharmacies. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2021;61(2):e94–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2020.10.010.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    PDAPS - Naloxone Overdose Prevention Laws. Accessed 29 Sept 2020. http://www.pdaps.org/datasets/laws-regulating-administration-of-naloxone-1501695139

  40. 40.

    Melaragni F, Levy C, Pedrazzi J, Andersen M. Assessing pharmacists’ readiness to dispense naloxone and counsel on responding to opioid overdoses. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2019;59(4):550–554.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2019.04.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Gupta R, Shah ND, Ross JS. The Rising Price of Naloxone — Risks to Efforts to Stem Overdose Deaths. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1609578, 2016.

  42. 42.

    U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts: United States. Accessed 6 Oct 2020. https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/GA,US/SEX255219.

  43. 43.

    Altekruse SF, Cosgrove CM, Altekruse WC, Jenkins RA, Blanco C. Socioeconomic risk factors for fatal opioid overdoses in the United States: Findings from the Mortality Disparities in American Communities Study (MDAC). PLoS One. 2020;15(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227966.

  44. 44.

    Smart R, Geiger CK, Jones CM, Stein BD. Prescribers and naloxone pharmacy claims. J Gen Intern Med. 2020;35(8):2475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-05791-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Confronting the National Opioid Crisis | AACP. Accessed 15 June 2021. https://www.aacp.org/article/confronting-national-opioid-crisis

  46. 46.

    Watson A, Guay K, Ribis D. Assessing the impact of clinical pharmacists on naloxone coprescribing in the primary care setting. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2020;77(7):568–73. https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaa007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Thompson EL, Rao PSS, Hayes C, Purtill C. Dispensing naloxone without a prescription: survey evaluation of Ohio pharmacists. J Pharm Pract. 2019;32(4):412–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0897190018759225.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Evoy KE, Groff L, Hill LG, Godinez W, Gandhi R, Reveles KR. Impact of student pharmacist–led naloxone academic detailing at community pharmacies in Texas. J Am Pharmac Assoc. 2020;60(1):81–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2019.09.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

John J. Brooks, Jr. and Olubukunola G. Onajin (both PharmD candidates from Mercer University College of Pharmacy) assisted with data collection. They were not compensated for this work.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LG – Writing – Reviewing and editing;JE: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing- Original draft preparation, Writing – Reviewing and editing, Supervision; LB – Investigation, writing; EO – Investigation, writing;; KR – Writing – Reviewing and editing; JN – Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – Reviewing and editing, Supervision. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Nguyễn.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Mercer University’s Institutional Review Board deemed the study to be exempt for the need for informed consent because no patient data were used.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no relevant conflicts of interest or financial relationships.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

A subset of this research, the exploration of naloxone availability in rural pharmacies in the state of Georgia was published in JAMA Network Open (Nguyễn et al. 2020).

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gilbert, L., Elliott, J., Beasley, L. et al. Naloxone availability in independent community pharmacies in Georgia, 2019. Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy 16, 63 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-021-00402-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • Naloxone
  • Pharmacies
  • Community pharmacy services
  • Opioids