Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Research
  • Open Access

Comorbid opioid use is undertreated among forensic patients with schizophrenia

  • 1Email author,
  • 1,
  • 2 and
  • 1, 3
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy201813:39

https://doi.org/10.1186/s13011-018-0177-y

  • Received: 26 February 2018
  • Accepted: 24 October 2018
  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Substance use disorders are associated with poorer clinical outcomes in patients with schizophrenia. There is no specific treatment for amphetamine or cannabis use disorder, but methadone and buprenorphine are used as replacement therapy in the treatment of opioid dependence. Our aim was to study whether patients with schizophrenia have received opioid replacement therapy for their opioid use disorder.

Methods

The study sample consisted of 148 individuals diagnosed with schizophrenia who were in involuntary psychiatric treatment as forensic patients in Finland in 2012. The proportion of the study sample with comorbid opioid use disorder having received opioid replacement therapy prior to their forensic psychiatric treatment was compared to the available information of opioid dependent patients in general. The data were collected from forensic examination statements, patient files and other medical registers retrospectively.

Results

Of the study sample, 15.6% (23/148) had a history of opioid use disorder, of whom 8.7% (2/23) had received opioid replacement treatment (95% confidence interval (Cl): 1.1–28.0), even though opioid use disorder had been diagnosed in the treatment system. According the available information the corresponding proportion among patients with opioid use disorder and using substance use disorder services was 30.4% (565/1860, 95% Cl: 28.3–32.5). The fraction of patients receiving opioid replacement therapy was significantly lower among patients with schizophrenia (p = 0.022).

Conclusions

Opioid replacement therapy was seldom used among schizophrenia patients who were later ordered to involuntary forensic psychiatric treatment. More attention should be paid to the possible use of opioids when planning treatment for patients with schizophrenia.

Trial registration

Our study is not a randomized controlled trial (but a register-based study); thus the trial registration is not applicable.

Keywords

  • Opioid replacement treatment
  • Schizophrenia
  • Forensic psychiatry

Background

Schizophrenia is a severe mental disorder, which affects the individual’s way of thinking, feeling and behaving in many ways. It is one of the leading causes of years lived with disability [1]. About half of the patients with schizophrenia have problems with substance use [24].The prevalence rates for the comorbidity vary between countries. In general, the prevalences are found to be lower in Europe than in the United States [5]. These comorbidities are associated not only with poorer clinical outcomes but also with the increased morbidity and mortality. Patients with comorbid substance use disorder are at a higher risk for medication noncompliance, they have more re-hospitalizations, they have poorer quality of life, and the rate of suicidality and violent behavior is higher [412].

Most of the studies concerning comorbid substance use disorder among patients with schizophrenia are focused on the assumed association between cannabis use and the development of schizophrenia, and less attention has been paid to other specific substances, although opioids are the most prevalent drugs among drug users in the European Union [13]. Also, when estimating the burden of disease consequent of drug dependence, the highest estimated global burden was attributable to opioid dependence [14]. Opioid users have a 15-fold increased risk of all-cause mortality when compared to the general population [15], and the risk is still high if the patient is on a waiting list for replacement treatment, indicating an urgent need of the therapy [16]. Detoxification is not an adequate treatment of substance dependence on its own, since relapse is almost inevitable. Opioid replacement therapy, combined with psychosocial assistance, has been found to be the most effective of the treatment options available [17]. World Health Organization (WHO) has stated that pharmacological treatment of opioid dependence should be accessible to all those in need, including those incarcerated and in other closed institutions. Also, according to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [18], comorbid mental health problems should be treated alongside opioid dependence.

No specific treatment for amphetamine or cannabis use disorder has been demonstrated, but buprenorphine and methadone are used as a replacement therapy in the treatment of opioid dependence. Research has shown the effectiveness of buprenorphine and methadone replacement therapy in reducing mortality and criminal activity, improving physical and mental health, and in decreasing illicit drug activity [1927], but there are only few studies on opioid replacement therapy among schizophrenia patients with comorbid opioid use disorder. Also, there are no previous studies on the prevalence of this treatment among persons with schizophrenia compared to other persons with opioid use disorder.

The combination of methadone and clozapine was successful when five schizophrenia patients with opioid addiction were treated [28]. Also, according to the study of Gerra et al. [29], the rate of heroin-addicted patients with schizophrenia who remained in replacement treatment and who obtained early full abstinence was higher when olanzapine was used compared to those who were treated with haloperidol. It has been stated that treatment of comorbid opioid use disorder in patients with schizophrenia should be a combination of case management and medical therapy [30]. In a study of adherence to methadone maintenance treatment, persons with a severe mental disorder as schizophrenia have significantly higher adherence to treatment, maybe because they are more closely monitored by health or social care professionals when compared to those without this comorbidity [31].

Our aim was to investigate the prevalence of opioid replacement therapy obtained by patients with schizophrenia and comorbid opioid use disorder prior to their forensic psychiatric treatment, and in other words, to find out whether this patient group had received similar pharmacological treatment for their opioid use disorder as compared to other patients using substance use disorder services.

Methods

The permission for the study was granted by the Board of Niuvanniemi Hospital and by the Finnish National Institute for Health and Welfare. The study sample included an annual cohort of patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorder who were in involuntary treatment in Niuvanniemi Hospital needing high-security hospital placement as forensic patients at any time in 2012. Niuvanniemi Hospital is a state mental hospital which is in charge of forensic psychiatric services and forensic mental examinations for the needs of the whole of Finland (www.niuva.fi). Opioid use disorder was defined as harmful use of opioids or opioid dependence. In Finland, the official diagnostic classification is ICD-10, according to which all of the diagnoses were made. In ICD-10, harmful use is described as a pattern of a psychoactive substance use that is causing physical or mental damage to health, and dependence as a cluster of behavioral cognitive, and physiological phenomena that develop after repeated substance use and that typically include a strong desire to take the drug, difficulties in controlling its use, persisting in its use despite harmful consequences, a higher priority given to drug use than to other activities and obligations, increased tolerance, and sometimes a physical withdrawal state [32]. All data concerning the study sample was collected retrospectively from forensic examination statements and patient files by the same person (K.K.), and it was checked if the criteria for harmful used or dependence were fulfilled.

In international comparison the Finnish practice of mental examinations can be considered to be very thorough. Preliminary information concerning persons undergoing mental examination is obtained from the persons themselves and, health care units in charge of previous treatment, and also, with their consent, from their family members, friends, employers etc. (www.niuva.fi). A comparison group to contrast the study sample with was from the available information, according to which 565 of the 1860 persons (30.4%) using substance use disorder services in 2011 were receiving replacement therapy. In this group, the mean age was 33, and the median age 32 years [33]. No individual level data such as age was available from the individuals in the national database of substance use disorder patients. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Fisher exact test. It was considered appropriate since the sample sizes were small.

Results

The cohort of forensic patients consisted of 148 persons, of whom 95.3% (141/148) were male, 56.1% (83/148) had paranoid, 20.3% (30/148) undifferentiated, 3.4% (5/184) hebephrenic, and 4.1% (6/184) some other type of schizophrenia. A total of 24/184 (16.2%) had a schizoaffective disorder (Table 1). The mean age of the sample was 42.8 years, and the mean age at the time of offense was 30.9 years. The average time from the offense leading to mental examination was about four years.
Table 1

Description of data demographics and main diagnoses

 

Sample

%

Male

141/148

95.3

Female

7/148

4.7

Type of schizophrenia

 Paranoid

83/148

56.1

 Undifferentiated

30/148

20.3

 Hebephrenic

5/148

3.4

 Other

6/148

4.1

 Schizoaffective disorder

24/148

16.2

Of the study sample, 15.6% (23/148) had a history of opioid use disorder documented in health care records, of whom and 8.7% (2/23) had received opioid replacement treatment (95% Cl:1.1–28.0).The corresponding proportion among patients with opioid use disorder using substance use disorder services was 30.4% (565/1860), (95%Cl: 28.3–32.5) (Table 2). The fraction of patients receiving replacement treatment was significantly lower among the cohort of forensic patients (p = 0.022).
Table 2

Prevalences of opioid replacement treatment

 

Fractions of patients receiving replacement treatment

95% confidence interval

Cohort of forensic patients

2/23

1.1–28.0

Patients using substance use disorder treatment services

565/1860

28.3.–32.5

Discussion

The present study evaluates the prevalence of opioid replacement therapy among patients with schizophrenia and comorbid opioid use disorder. Many studies have focused to the nature of the relationship between cannabis use and schizophrenia but less attention has been paid to other specific substances. The burden of disease consequent of drug dependence is highest when it is question of opioid use disorder [34], and patients diagnosed with this comorbidity belong to the costliest group of all patients with opioid use disorder [35]. Evidence based medications for opioid dependence have been shown to be helpful in patients with severe mental disorder [36], but on the other hand, the retention rate in opioid replacement therapy among patients with schizophrenia at 12 months was less than 10%, and over half of the patients had illicit opioid use during the treatment according to the study of Gerra et al., 2006 [37]. Patients with this comorbidity are more likely to have been homeless and to have had a recent psychiatric hospitalization when compared to other patients [38]. In an Iranian descriptive study of 100 patients with schizophrenia, as much as half of the patients had opioid dependence disorder based on DSM-IV criteria. This high prevalence is probably influenced by the easy access and low price of opioids in Iran. However, it was speculated that patients with schizophrenia may use opioids as self-medication to reduce positive symptoms [39]. The antipsychotic effectiveness of opioid agonists is highlighted in a recent review, in which it is suggested that the use of opioid agonists deserves reconsideration because of their anticraving capability and effectiveness on the psychopathological level [40]. It has also been stated that specific groups, including patients with psychiatric comorbidities, may benefit from optimized and higher doses of buprenorphine to ensure sufficient dosing [41]. It is relevant to combine antipsychotic and opioid agonist medications with psychosocial support [38], since group counselling, contingency management and long-term residential treatment have been shown to have positive effects [42].

In our study, only two of the 23 patients with schizophrenia and comorbid opioid use had received opioid replacement treatment prior to hospital treatment as forensic patients. In comparison, the estimated proportion of persons with opioid use disorder undergoing replacement therapy suggests a treatment coverage rate of about 50% in the European Union [43]. In Finland, opioid replacement treatment is typically initiated in inpatient units, after which the clients are transferred to social outpatient services or health centers. General practitioners and pharmacies are also participating in the treatment process. There is no other monitoring system or register of clients in treatment but data collection on a voluntary and anonymous basis by the centers for prevention and treatment of addiction. Also, the coverage of replacement therapy in Finland may vary between different regions. The proportion of opioid users using substance abuse treatment services and receiving replacement therapy in 2011 was 30.4% of problem opioid users using those services and the mean age of those opioid users was 33.0 years [33]. Information did not cover all substance abuse treatment units. It is not known if the patients in the study sample or in the comparison group received other types of treatments. However, when the effect of adding psychosocial treatment interventions to standard opioid agonist treatment programs was compared, it was found that psychosocial treatment did not offer additional benefits in terms of retaining individuals in treatment, supporting abstinence, or preventing relapse [44].

Mental health care and substance use disorder services are often separated from each other, although the coordination of different services is essential for successful treatment of patients with dual diagnoses. In Finland, substance use services are mostly provided by social welfare. Integrated treatment might have benefits for reducing the risk of violent behavior in these patients, since additive genetic influences are shared between schizophrenia, substance use disorder, and violent behavior. Substance use disorder was defined as either harmful use or dependence since in practice, harmful substance use can be quite severe and sometimes it is challenging to distinguish the two.

The information of persons with opioid use disorder and their treatment is incomplete. In this study, it was presumed that the information available was representative enough since information from different substance use disorder services was not described to be missing from systematic reasons.

Our study cohort is not a complete cohort of all offender patients with schizophrenia in Finland. However, it is well representative of patients requiring high-security treatment, since vast majority of those patients are treated in Niuvanniemi Hospital. Those who do not require high-security treatment are located in medium-security units of communities. According to our study, at least in this subgroup of patients with schizophrenia, opioid agonists were rarely used. The possible use of psychosocial methods in treating opioid use disorder was not studied. The latest estimate of individuals in Finland with problem opioid use is from the year 2012 being 13,000–15,000 [45]. In Finland, the number of patients in opioid replacement treatment has increased being about 30% higher in 2015 than in 2011 [46]. However, recent prevalence rates of opioid users indicate increase at least in heroin use [47], and so it can be expected that the number of opioid users and opioid use disorders is going to grow. However, the results of this study should be interpreted with care, since the study sample is from the year 2012.

There are only a limited number of studies exploring the relationship between opioids and psychoses, and the causal connection between opioid use and psychosis is still unclear. In general, the prevalence of psychoses and comorbid opioid use has been found to be low [48]. In the study of Dalmau and colleagues [49], the prevalence of psychotic illness was high among those with amphetamine and cannabis use disorder but lower among those with opioid use disorder. The lifetime rate of opioid use among persons with schizophrenia was about 12% according to Barnes et al. [2]. Comorbid psychotic illness and opioid use is associated with increased mortality [50].

In guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of opioid dependence [15, 5153], schizophrenia is not mentioned to be a contraindication for opioid replacement therapy.

Conclusions

Our results indicate that opioid use disorder is not, at least pharmacologically, treated in the same way among patients with schizophrenia as other persons with opioid use disorder. More attention should be paid to possible opioid use when planning treatments for patients with schizophrenia, since this patient group needs to have effective treatment for their co-occurring mental and substance use disorders to reduce morbidity, mortality, and risky behavior. Further studies of the possible advantages and disadvantages of opioid replacement therapy in patients with schizophrenia and comorbid opioid use are needed.

Abbreviations

CI: 

Confidence interval

DSM-V: 

Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, fifth version

WHO: 

World Health Organization

Declarations

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The project was funded by the Finnish Ministry of Health and Social Affairs through the development fund for Niuvanniemi Hospital, Kuopio, Finland.

Availability of data and materials

The data is not publicly available. For further information regarding the data and materials used please contact corresponding author.

Authors’ contributions

KK and JT designed the study. HK conducted the statistical analyses. KK drafted the manuscript, and incorporated suggestions from all co-authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The permission for the study was granted by the Board of Niuvanniemi Hospital and by the Finnish National Institute for Health and Welfare. Consents to participate was not obtained from participants (register-based study).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Kristiina Kivimies, Eila Repo-Tiihonen, and Hannu Kautiainen report no conflicts of interest. Jari Tiihonen reports serving as a consultant to European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Finnish Medicines Agency (Fimea); receiving lecture fees from Eli Lilly, Janssen-Cilag, Lundbeck, and Otsuka; grants from from Stanley Foundation and Sigrid Jusélius Foundation; and participating in research projects funded by Janssen-Cilag and Eli Lilly with grants paid to Karolinska Institutet.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Forensic Psychiatry, University of Eastern Finland, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Niuvankuja 65, FI-70240 Kuopio, Finland
(2)
Department of General Practice, Unit of Primary Health Care, Helsinki University Central Hospital, University of Helsinki, PO Box 20, Helsingin yliopisto, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
(3)
Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Byggnad R5, SE-171 76 Stockholm, Sweden

References

  1. Whiteford HA, Degenhardt L, Rehm J, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to mental and substance use disorders: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2013;382:1575–86.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes TRE, Mutsatsa SH, Hutton SB, Watt HC, Joyce EM. Comorbid substance use and age at onset of schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry. 2006;188:237–42.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Regier DA, Farmer ME, Rae DS, et al. Comorbidity of mental disorders with alcohol and other drug abuse. Results from the epidemiological catchment area (ECA) study. J Am Med Assoc. 1990;264:2511–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Swofford CD, Scheller-Gilkey G, Miller AH, Woolvine B, Mance R. Double jeopardy: schizophrenia and substance use. Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse. 2000;26:343–53.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Carrà G, Johnson S, Bebbington P, Angermeyer MC, Heider D, Brugha T, Azorin JM, Toumi M. The lifetime and past-year prevalence of dual diagnosis in people with schizophrenia across Europe: findings from the European schizophrenia cohort (EuroSC). Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2012;262:607–16.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Fazel S, Gulati G, Linsell L, Geddes JR, Grann M. Schizophrenia and violence: systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2009;6:e1000120.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  7. Melle I, Johannessen JO, Friis S, et al. Course and predictors of suicidality over the first two years of treatment in first-episode schizophrenia spectrum psychosis. Arch Suicide Res. 2010;14:158–70.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Olfson M, Mechanic D, Hansell S, Boyer CA, Walkup J, Weiden PJ. Predicting medication noncompliance after hospital discharge among patients with schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv. 2000;51:216–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Schmidt LM, Hesse M, Lykke J. The impact of substance use disorders on the course of schizophrenia- a 15-year follow-up study: dual diagnosis over 15 years. Schizophr Res. 2011;130:228–33.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Swartz MS, Swanson JW, Hiday VA, Borum R, Wagner HR, Burns BJ. Violence and severe mental illness: the effects of substance abuse and nonadherence to medication. Am J Psychiatry. 1998;155:226–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Carrà G, Johnson S, Crocamo C, Angermeyer MC, Brugha T, Azorin JM, Toumi M, Bebbington PE. Psychosocial functioning, quality of life and clinical correlates of comorbid alcohol and drug dependence syndromes in people with schizophrenia across Europe. Psychiatry Res. 2016;30(239):301–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Weibell MA, Hegelstad WTV, Auestad B, et al. The effect of substance use on 10-year outcome in first-episode psychosis. Schizophr Bull. 2017;43:843–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Literature review. In: The levels of use of opioids, amphetamines and cocaine and associated levels of harm: summary of scientific evidence; 2014. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/780/Levels_of_drug_use_and_harm_Literature_review_465346.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2018.Google Scholar
  14. Degenhardt L, Whiteford HA, Ferrari AJ, et al. Global burden of disease attributable to illicit drug use and dependence: findings from the global burden of disease study 2010. Lancet. 2013;382:1564–74.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chesney E, Goodwin GM, Fazel S. Risks of all-cause and suicide mortality in mental disorders: a meta-review. World Psychiatry. 2014;13:153–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Peles E, Schreiber S, Adelson M. Opiate-dependent patients on a waiting list for methadone maintenance treatment are at a higher risk for mortality until treatment entry. J Addict Med. 2013;7:177–82.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  17. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the psychosocially assisted pharmacological treatment of opioid dependence. 2009. http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/opioid_dependence_guidelines.pdf Google Scholar
  18. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Drug misuse: opioid detoxification. 2008. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg52/evidence/drug-misuse-opioid-detoxification-full-guideline-196515037. Accessed 9 Feb 2018.Google Scholar
  19. Bukten A, Skurtveit S, Gossop M, et al. Engagement with opioid maintenance treatment and reductions in crime: a longitudinal national cohort study. Addiction. 2012;107:393–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Havnes I, Bukten A, Gossop M, Waal H, Stangeland P, Clausen T. Reductions in convictions for violent crime during opioid maintenance treatment: a longitudinal national cohort study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2012;124:307–10.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  21. Mattick RP, Breen C, Kimber J, Davoli M. Methadone maintenance therapy versus no opioid replacement therapy for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:CD002209.Google Scholar
  22. Mattick RP, Breen C, Kimber J, Davoli M. Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2:CD002207.Google Scholar
  23. Nolan S, Hayashi K, Milloy MJ, et al. The impact of low-threshold methadone maintenance treatment on mortality in a Canadian setting. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2015;156:57–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Soyka M, Träder A, Klotsche J, et al. Criminal behavior in opioid-dependent patients before and during maintenance therapy: 6-year follow-up of a nationally representative cohort sample. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57:1524–30.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Sporer KA. Strategies for preventing heroin overdose. Brit Med J. 2003;326:442–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  26. Teoh Bing Fei J, Yee A, Habil MH, Danaee M. Effectiveness of methadone maintenance therapy and improvement in quality of life following a decade of implementation. J Subst Abus Treat. 2016;69:50–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Vorma H, Sokero P, Aaltonen M, Turtiainen S, Hughes L, Savolainen J. Participation in opioid substitution treatment reduces the rate of criminal convictions: evidence from a community study. Addict Behav. 2013;38:2313–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Unglaub W, Kandel M, Zenner D, Wodarz N, Klein H. Neuroleptic therapy of comorbid narcotic dependent patients in ambulatory methadone maintenance. Psychiatr Prax. 2003;30(Suppl 2):S121–4 German.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Gerra G, Di Petta G, D'Amore A, Iannotta P, Bardicchia F, Falorni F, Coacci A, Strepparola G, Campione G, Lucchini A, Vedda G, Serio G, Manzato E, Antonioni M, Bertacca S, Moi G, Zaimovic A. Combination of olanzapine with opioid-agonists in the treatment of heroin-addicted patients affected by comorbid schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Clin Neuropharmacol. 2007;30:127–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kern AM, Akerman SC, Nordstrom BR. Opiate dependence in schizophrenia: case presentation and literature review. J Dual Diagn. 2014;10:52–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Parpouchi M, Moniruzzaman A, Rezansoff SN, Russolillo A, Somers JM. Characteristics of adherence to methadone maintenance treatment over a 15-year period among homeless adults experiencing mental illness. Addict Behav Rep. 2017;6:106–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th Revision (ICD-10)-WHO Version for 2016. 2017. http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2016/en#/F10-F19. Accessed 9 Feb 2018.
  33. Forsell M. Päihdehuollon huumeasiakkaat 2011. Terveyden ja hyvinvoinnin laitos. 2012;19:1–65. http://www.julkarifi/bitstream/handle/10024/103097/Tr19_12pdf?sequence=1.
  34. UNODC (United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime). World Drug Report 2017: United Nations publication, Sales no. E.17.XI.6; 2017. Vienna, Austria. http://www.unodc.org/wdr2017/field/Booklet_1_EXSUM.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2018
  35. Shei A, Rice JB, Kirson NY, Bodnar K, Enloe CJ, Birnbaum HG, Holly P, Ben-Joseph R. Characteristics of high-cost patients diagnosed with opioid abuse. J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2015;21:902–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Robertson AG, Easter MM, Lin HJ, Frisman LK, Swanson JW, Swartz MS. Associations between pharmacotherapy for opioid dependence and clinical and criminal justice outcomes among adults with co-occurring serious mental illness. J Subst Abus Treat. 2018;86:17–25.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Gerra G, Leonardi C, D'Amore A, et al. Buprenorphine treatment outcome in dually diagnosed heroin dependent patients: a retrospective study. Prog Neuro psychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2006;30:265–72.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Marienfeld C, Rosenheck RA. Psychiatric services and prescription fills among veterans with serious mental illness in methadone maintenance treatment. J Dual Diagn. 2015;11:128–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Ghaffarinejad A, Kerdegary M. Relationship of opioid dependence and positive and negative symptoms in schizophrenic patients. Addict Health. 2009;1:69–72.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Maremmani AGI, Rovai L, Rugani F, Bacciardi S, Dell’ Osso L, Maremmani I. Substance abuse and psychosis. The strange case of opioids. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18:287–302.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Maremmani I, Rolland B, Somaini L, et al. Buprenorphine dosing choices in specific populations: review of expert opinion. Exp Opin Pharmacother. 2016;17:1727–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  42. Drake RE, O'Neal EL, Wallach MA. A systematic review of psychosocial research on psychosocial interventions for people with co-occurring severe mental and substance use disorders. J Subst Abus Treat. 2008;34:123–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Annual report 2010: the state of the drugs problem in Europe. In: Opioid use and drug injection; 2010. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/online/annual-report/2010/opioids/5 .Accessed 9 Feb 2018.Google Scholar
  44. Amato L, Minozzi S, Davoli M, Vecchi S. Psychosocial combined with agonist maintenance treatments versus agonist maintenance treatments alone for treatment of opioid dependence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;10:CD004147.Google Scholar
  45. EMCDDA (European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction). Finland, Country Drug Report 2017. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2017d. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/system/files/publications/4524/TD0416915ENN.pdf_en. Accessed 11 Jan 2018Google Scholar
  46. Partanen A, Alho H, Forsell M, Kotovirta E, Kuussaari K, Mäkelä N, Rönkä S, Selin J, Vorma H. Opioidikorvaushoito on laajentunut ja monimuotoistunut. Suomen Lääkärilehti. 2017;72:2981–5 In Finnish.Google Scholar
  47. Marsh JC, Park K, Lin YA, Bersamira C. Gender differences in trends for heroin use and nonmedical prescription opioid use, 2007–2014. J Subst Abus Treat. 2018;87:79–85.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  48. Margolese HC, Malchy L, Negrete JC, Tempier R, Gill K. Drug and alcohol use among patients with schizophrenia and related psychoses: levels and consequences. Schizophr Res. 2004;67:157–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Dalmau A, Bergman B, Brismar B. Psychotic disorders among inpatients with abuse of cannabis, amphetamine and opiates. Do dopaminergic stimulants facilitate psychiatric illness? Eur Psychiatry. 1999;14:366–71.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Sorensen HJ, Jepsen PW, Haastrup S, Juel K. Drug-use pattern, comorbid psychosis and mortality in people with a history of opioid addiction. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005;111:244–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  51. Department of Health (England) and the devolved administrations. Drug misuse and dependence: UK guidelines on clinical management. London: Department of Health (England), the Scottish Government, Welsh Assembly Government and Northern Ireland Executive2007 http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20170807160700/http://www.nta.nhs.uk/uploads/clinical_guidelines_2007.pdf. Accessed 9 Feb 2018.
  52. European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction. Best practice portal: Treatment options for opioid users. 2016. http://www.emcdda.europa.eu/best-practice/treatment/opioid-users. Accessed 9 Feb 2018.Google Scholar
  53. The Finnish Medical Society Duodecim Working group set up by the Finnish Medical Society Duodecim and the Finnish Society of Addiction Medicine Treatment of drug abuse (online). Current Care Guidelines. Helsinki: www.kaypahoito.fi (in Finnish). 2012. Accessed 9 Feb 2018.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2018

Advertisement