Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics at baseline (n (%))

From: The efficacy of integrated hepatitis C virus treatment in relieving fatigue in people who inject drugs: a randomized controlled trial

 

Integrated treatmentc (n = 141)

Standard treatmentc (n = 135)

Age (years)

 18–29

14 (10)

16 (12)

 30–39

41 (29)

43 (32)

 40–49

44 (31)

45 (33)

 ≥ 50

42 (30)

31 (23)

 Median (IQR)

44 (36–52)

42 (34–49)

Sex

 Male

103 (73)

109 (81)

Educational attainment

 Not completed primary school

7 (5)

12 (9)

 Completed primary school (9 years)

67 (48)

66 (49)

 Completed high school (12 years)

52 (37)

44 (31)

 Completed college or university

13 (9)

14 (10)

Opioid agonist therapy

120 (85)

120 (88)

Unstable housing past 30 daysa

21 (14)

18 (13)

Injected drug use past 12 months

81 (58)

83 (64)

Frequent drug use past 12 monthsb

 Alcohol

35 (25)

32 (25)

 Benzodiazepines

55 (40)

52 (41)

 Cannabis

75 (54)

72 (56)

 Opioids

17 (12)

15 (12)

 Stimulants (amphetamines and cocaine)

48 (35)

39 (30)

Infectious diseases

 Hepatitis C virus genotypes

  1

47 (34)

44 (33)

  2

< 10 (1)

< 10 (4)

  3

91 (65)

80 (61)

  4

< 5 (0)

< 5 (1)

  6

< 5 (0)

< 5 (1)

 Hepatitis B virus infection

0 (0)

0 (0)

 Human immunodeficiency virus

0 (0)

< 5 (0)

Liver stiffness

 Transient elastography (≥ 12.5 kPa)

22 (16)

14 (11)

 Aspartate transaminase to platelets ratio index (≥ 1.5)

13 (10)

13 (11)

  1. The table displays the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of participants randomly assigned to integrated and standard HCV treatment groups
  2. Legends: FSS-9 Nine-item fatigue severity scale, IQR Interquartile range, kPa Kilopascal
  3. aUnstable housing was defined as living in a homeless shelter, with family or friends, or on the street during the 30 days leading up to the first health assessment (baseline)
  4. bFrequent drug use was defined as using substance at least weekly during the 12 months leading up to the first health assessment (baseline)
  5. cNone basic characteristics were significantly different, comparing the integrated treatment group to the standard treatment group, with a significance level of 0.05