Skip to main content

Table 3 Themes 2, 3, & 4 according to VSM levels

From: Perspectives of service providers on aftercare service provision for persons with substance use disorders at a Rural District in South Africa

Beer’s VSM Levels

Theme 2

Identifying existing barriers to aftercare service provision

Theme 3

Situating systemic enablers to aftercare service provision

Theme 4

Associated aftercare systems recommendations

Implementation level

• Internal Motivation of PWSUD

• Family denial

• Family’s limited knowledge of recovery process

• Stigmatization of PWSUD

• Poor community participation/partnerships in rehabilitation

• Long waiting lists in ITCs

• Unavailability of medication for withdrawal

• Lack of education and training about SUD for service providers

• Limited transport for service providers

• Poor inter-sectoral collaboration

• Lack of funding for aftercare services

• Team approach at hospitals and clinic level by DoH

• High level of motivation of a PWSUD

• Strong family support

• Telephonic follow-ups from ITCs

Case manager or coordinator is required to coordinate aftercare services

Teamwork in proving aftercare services

• Teamwork should be facilitated through clinic card and CCG

• Community partnerships facilitated through education cognizant of the cultural context.

Coordination level

Poor communication among stakeholders rendering services within the same community

Limited awareness of each stakeholder’s roles, responsibilities and scope of practice.

Poor communication between ITC & referring service providers

The necessity of collaborating with community caregivers.

Encouraging inter-sectoral collaboration among various sectors

Inter-sectoral collaboration should be facilitated through war-room

Control level

Evaluation of SUD Services: poorly managed and monitored

Maximizing on war-rooms

Considering a Ward-based approach

Strengthen monitoring and evaluative mechanism for aftercare services.

Intelligence/

development level

Limited accountability and reporting of NGOs to local institutions

Absence of aftercare statistics in Provincial reports

Negligible support for SUD programs

Accountability of NGOs should also be at institutional level i.e. DSD facilities or hospital.

Encouraging comprehensive details of SUD in reports

Policy level

SUD programs not prioritized by DoH and DSD

NGOs reporting renewal at policy level only

Lack of standard of care

Lack of policy awareness

Policies in place

Revisiting the accountability of NGOs