Skip to main content

Table 1 Association between OAT and Provision of Injecting Initiation Assistance among PWID subgroups in Vancouver, Canada (n = 1218)

From: The influence of poly-drug use patterns on the association between opioid agonist treatment engagement and injecting initiation assistance

 

Did not assist others in their first injection in the past 6 months

Assisted others in their first injection in the past 6 months

Total

P-valuea

1. High Frequency Methamphetamine IDU; Low-to-Moderate NIDUb

 OAT=No

98 (87.5%)

14 (12.5%)

112 (69.1%)

0.152

 OAT=Yes

4 (96.0%)

2 (4.0%)

50 (30.9%)

 

Total

146 (90.1%)

16 (9.9%)

162

 

2. Moderate-to-High Frequency Heroin IDU; High Frequency Heroin NIDU; and Moderate-to-High Frequency Methamphetamine IDU and NIDUb

 OAT=No

55 (88.7%)

7 (11.3%)

62 (48.4%)

0.792

 OAT=Yes

57 (86.4%)

9 (13.6%)

66 (51.6%)

 

Total

112 (87.5%)

16 (12.5%)

128

 

3. Low Frequency Use of All Drugsb

 OAT=No

133 (97.8%)

3 (2.2%)

136 (46.1%)

> 0.999

 OAT=Yes

156 (98.1%)

3 (1.9%)

159 (53.9%)

 

Total

289 (98.0%)

6 (2.0%)

295

 

4. High Frequency Heroin IDU and Methamphetamine IDU, and Low-to-Moderate Frequency PO IDU and Methamphetamine NIDUb

 OAT=No

86 (81.1%)

20 (18.9%)

106 (52.7%)

< 0.001

 OAT=Yes

92 (96.8%)

3 (3.2%)

95 (47.3%)

 

Total

178 (88.6%)

23 (11.4%)

201

 

5. High Frequency Heroin IDUb

 OAT=No

96 (91.4%)

9 (8.6%)

105 (27.7%)

0.121

 OAT=Yes

167 (96.0%)

7 (4.0%)

274 (72.3%)

 

Total

263 (94.3%)

16 (5.7%)

379

 

6. High Frequency Cocaine IDU and Low-to-Moderate Heroin IDUb

 OAT=No

61 (95.3%)

3 (4.7%)

64 (41.8%)

> 0.999

 OAT=Yes

84 (94.4%)

5 (5.6%)

89 (58.2%)

 

Total

145 (94.8%)

8 (5.2%)

153

 
  1. aFisher’s exact test
  2. bThe class refers to activities during the previous six months
  3. IDU Injection Drug Use, NIDU Non-Injection Drug Use, OAT Opioid Agonist Treatment