Skip to main content

Table 3 Associations of fatal opioid overdose (OD). N = 22,079. Cox Regression Models (Hazard Ratios and 95% CIs)

From: Socioeconomic correlates of incident and fatal opioid overdose among Swedish people with opioid use disorder

 

UNIVARIATE MODELS

MULTIVARIATE MODEL

Male sex

2.10 (1.77; 2.49)*

1.77 (1.49; 2.11)*

Age at OUD registration

0.97 (0.97; 0.98)*

0.88 (0.86; 0.90)*

Year of birth

1.02 (1.02; 1.03)*

0.90 (0.88; 0.93)*

Country of birth

 Nordic countries (vs. Sweden)

1.51 (1.04; 2.18)a*

NS

 Europe (vs. Sweden)

0.59 (0.40; 0.87)a*

NS

 Asia (vs. Sweden)

0.56 (0.40; 0.79)a*

NS

 Outside Europe/Asia (vs. Sweden)

0.78 (0.49; 1.26)a*

NS

Criminal conviction

2.01 (1.67; 2.41)a*

1.93 (1.61; 2.32)*

Education (years)

0.94 (0.91; 0.97)a*

NS

School grades

0.95 (0.87; 1.03)a*

N/Ab

IQ

0.89 (0.78; 1.01)a

N/Ab

Resilience

0.88 (0.78; 1.00)a

N/Ab

Parental education (years)

1.00 (0.97; 1.03)a

N/Ab

Social welfare

1.33 (1.15; 1.55)a*

NS

Income

0.84 (0.72; 0.97)a*

NS

Neighborhood deprivation

1.03 (0.99; 1.06)a

NS

Married

0.76 (0.62; 0.94)a*

NS

1 ≤ children

0.84 (0.70; 1.00)a

NS

Distance to mother

 0–10 km (vs. same place)

0.88 (0.73; 1.06)a

N/Ab

 10–50 km (vs. same place)

1.09 (0.83; 1.43)a

N/Ab

 50+ km (vs. same place)

1.14 (0.68; 1.92)a

N/Ab

Distance to father

 0–10 km (vs. same place)

0.86 (0.70; 1.06)a

N/Ab

 10–50 km (vs. same place)

0.96 (0.72; 1.29)a

N/Ab

 50+ km (vs. same place)

1.08 (0.65; 1.79)a

N/Ab

Prior OUD/opioid OD

2.90 (2.28; 3.70)*

2.12 (1.65; 2.72)*

Inpatient registration of OUD

1.23 (1.06; 1.43)a*

NS

Psychiatric disorder

1.66 (1.42; 1.93)a*

1.59 (1.36; 1.85)*

  1. HR Hazard ratio, CI confidence interval, OD overdose, OUD opioid use disorder, N/A not available, NS not significant
  2. aControlled for sex, age at registration, year of birth, prior OUD/opioid OD
  3. bVariable not included in the multivariable analysis due to a relatively large proportion of missing information. These variables were not missing due to poor register quality; rather, they were missing because not all individuals were represented in all registers (e.g. The Conscript Register includes almost exclusively men)
  4. * p < 0.05