Skip to main content

Table 3 Summary of logistic regression models on workplace SHS exposure and smoking harm awareness

From: The association of workplace health education with smoking-related behaviour and unequal gains by job position in China: ABWMC programme findings

  SHS exposure Smoking harm awareness
Model l (Main Effect) Model 2 (Interactions) Model l (Main Effect) Model 2
(Interactions)
OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI OR 95% CI
Health education
 Without   Ref   Ref   Ref   Ref
 Have but not attend 0.90* 0.82–0.99 0.92 0.82–1.03 1.40* 1.22–1.61 1.47* 1.24–1.74
 Have and attend 0.73* 0.67–0.79 0.73* 0.66–0.81 2.11* 1.88–2.36 2.23* 1.94–2.56
Gender
 Male   Ref   Ref   Ref   Ref
 Female 0.53* 0.50–0.57 0.53* 0.50–0.57 0.96 0.87–1.07 0.96 0.87–1.07
Age
 50 and above 0.85 0.64–1.13 0.85 0.64–1.13 1.10 0.70–1.71 1.10 0.70–1.71
 40–49 0.77* 0.68–0.88 0.77* 0.68–0.88 1.32* 1.08–1.59 1.32* 1.09–1.60
 30–39 0.83* 0.75–0.91 0.83* 0.75–0.91 1.00 0.87–1.16 1.00 0.87–1.16
 16–29   Ref   Ref   Ref   Ref
Ethnicity
 Han   Ref   Ref   Ref   Ref
 Others 0.90 0.76–1.06 0.90 0.76–1.06 0.81 0.62–1.06 0.81 0.62–1.06
Education
 High school/lower   Ref   Ref   Ref   Ref
 College / above 0.59* 0.53–0.64 0.59* 0.53–0.64 2.00* 1.70–2.36 2.00* 1.70–2.36
Marriage
 Single   Ref   Ref   Ref   Ref
 Married 1.02 0.93–1.12 1.02 0.93–1.12 0.87 0.76–1.00 0.87 0.76–1.00
 Divorced 1.33 0.96–1.85 1.330.96–1.85 0.96–1.85 0.73 0.43–1.25 0.73 0.43–1.25
Job position
 Not administrative   Ref   Ref   Ref   Ref
 Administrative 1.09* 1.00–1.18 1.11* 1.00–1.22 0.92 0.82–1.03 1.00 0.85–1.17
Health training×Job position
 Without     Ref     Ref
 Have but not attend    0.93 0.76–1.14    0.86 0.63–1.16
 Have and attend    0.97 0.83–1.17    0.85 0.67–1.08
  1. Note: *p < 0.05
  2. Model 1 only entered the main effects of health education, job position and covariates
  3. Model 2 was also added interaction terms between health education and job position