The association of workplace health education with smoking-related behaviour and unequal gains by job position in China: ABWMC programme findings

Table 3 Summary of logistic regression models on workplace SHS exposure and smoking harm awareness

	SHS exposure				Smoking harm awareness
	Model l (Main Effect)		Model 2 (Interactions)		Model l (Main Effect)		Model 2 (Interactions)
	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI	OR	95% CI
Health education
Without		Ref		Ref		Ref		Ref
Have but not attend	0.90*	0.82–0.99	0.92	0.82–1.03	1.40*	1.22–1.61	1.47*	1.24–1.74
Have and attend	0.73*	0.67–0.79	0.73*	0.66–0.81	2.11*	1.88–2.36	2.23*	1.94–2.56
Gender
Male		Ref		Ref		Ref		Ref
Female	0.53*	0.50–0.57	0.53*	0.50–0.57	0.96	0.87–1.07	0.96	0.87–1.07
Age
50 and above	0.85	0.64–1.13	0.85	0.64–1.13	1.10	0.70–1.71	1.10	0.70–1.71
40–49	0.77*	0.68–0.88	0.77*	0.68–0.88	1.32*	1.08–1.59	1.32*	1.09–1.60
30–39	0.83*	0.75–0.91	0.83*	0.75–0.91	1.00	0.87–1.16	1.00	0.87–1.16
16–29		Ref		Ref		Ref		Ref
Ethnicity
Han		Ref		Ref		Ref		Ref
Others	0.90	0.76–1.06	0.90	0.76–1.06	0.81	0.62–1.06	0.81	0.62–1.06
Education
High school/lower		Ref		Ref		Ref		Ref
College / above	0.59*	0.53–0.64	0.59*	0.53–0.64	2.00*	1.70–2.36	2.00*	1.70–2.36
Marriage
Single		Ref		Ref		Ref		Ref
Married	1.02	0.93–1.12	1.02	0.93–1.12	0.87	0.76–1.00	0.87	0.76–1.00
Divorced	1.33	0.96–1.85	1.330.96–1.85	0.96–1.85	0.73	0.43–1.25	0.73	0.43–1.25
Job position
Not administrative		Ref		Ref		Ref		Ref
Administrative	1.09*	1.00–1.18	1.11*	1.00–1.22	0.92	0.82–1.03	1.00	0.85–1.17
Health training×Job position
Without				Ref				Ref
Have but not attend			0.93	0.76–1.14			0.86	0.63–1.16
Have and attend			0.97	0.83–1.17			0.85	0.67–1.08

Note: *p < 0.05
Model 1 only entered the main effects of health education, job position and covariates
Model 2 was also added interaction terms between health education and job position

ISSN: 1747-597X