Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariate association of the sociodemographic and social influence factors by hookah use patterns (never, exclusive and Dual/Poly hookah users) (n = 1759)a

From: Hookah use patterns, social influence and associated other substance use among a sample of New York City public university students

 

Exclusive hookah use

vs. Never hookah use (ref) (N = 1538)

Dual/Poly hookah use

vs. Never hookah use (ref) (N = 1415)

Dual/Poly hookah use vs.

Exclusive hookah use (ref) (N = 305)

 

AOR (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI)

AOR (95% CI)

Age

 18–19

1.00

1.00

1.00

 20–21

0.97 (0.57, 1.63)

0.87 (0.41, 1.84)

1.08 (0.47, 2.52)

 22–23

1.50 (0.90, 2.50)

0.81 (0.36, 1.82)

0.53 (0.23, 1.25)

 24–25

1.04 (0.56, 1.96)

1.08 (0.40, 2.88)

1.80 (0.60, 5.42)

Gender

 Male

0.84 (0.57, 1.96)

0.90 (0.52, 1.57)

0.97 (0.52, 1.79)

 Female

1.00

1.00

1.00

Race/ethnicity

 NH-White

1.00

1.00

1.00

 NH-Blackb

0.61 (0.29, 1.26)

N/Ab

N/Ab

 Hispanic/Latino

1.56 (0.30, 1.06)

0.97 (0.43, 2.19)

0.54 (0.23, 1.25)

 Asian/ NI/PI

0.56 (0.30, 1.06)

0.53 (0.25, 1.13)

1.20 (0.49, 2.95)

 Caribbean/West Indian

1.27 (0.69, 2.34)

0.35 (0.14, 0.88)*

0.23 (0.08, 0.67)**

 Other

0.75 (0.37, 1.51)

0.64 (0.27, 1.55)

1.04 (0.39, 2.78)

Currently employed

 Yes

1.85 (1.27, 2.69)**

1.34 (0.79, 2.29)

0.68 (0.37, 1.28)

 No

1.00

1.00

1.00

Household income

  < $20,000

0.87 (0.56, 1.37)

0.60 (0.30, 1.21)

0.72 (0.33, 1.57)

 $20,000 - $49,999

1.00

1.00

1.00

  > $50,000

1.05 (0.67, 1.67)

1.25 (0.65, 2.40)

1.11 (0.55, 2.22)

Perceived Social Disapproval of Hookah Smokingc

 Yes

1.00

1.00

1.00

 No

1.72 (1.18, 2.52)**

4.04 (2.27, 7.19)**

3.14 (1.64, 6.02)**

Close Friends use of hookahd

 0–2

1.00

1.00

1.00

 3–4

3.89 (2.47, 6.12)**

5.11 (2.67, 9.80)**

1.53 (0.70, 3.33)

 5 or more

12.43 (7.96, 19.39)**

6.65 (3.27, 13.54)**

0.52 (0.26, 1.05)

  1. AOR adjusted odds ratio, CI confidence interval, NH non-Hispanic, NI native indians, PI pacific islander
  2. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01
  3. aThis analysis excludes exclusive tobacco users and former hookah smokers
  4. bThis category is not included in the analyses due to the small number (n = 1)
  5. cPerceived social disapproval of hookah smoking was ascertained as a binary variable by assessing participants’ agreement to the statement “People who are important to you believe that you should not smoke hookah”
  6. dClose friends was defined as the friends that you spend time with on a regular basis