Skip to main content

Table 4 Social support in MMT treatment

From: Treatment adherence amongst drug users attending public and private methadone maintenance clinics in a northern province of Vietnam

Characteristics

Completely adherence

Incompletely adherence

Total

p-value

n

%

n

%

n

%

Current support provider

 None

41

24.0

47

21.0

88

22.3

0.48*

 Health workers at MMT facility

85

49.7

78

34.8

163

41.3

< 0.01*

 Other health workers

4

2.3

4

1.8

8

2.0

0.73¢

 Relatives in family

130

76.0

177

79.0

307

77.7

0.48*

 Peer in MMT

22

12.9

45

20.1

67

17.0

0.06*

 Neighbors/other acquaintances

9

5.3

7

3.1

16

4.1

0.29*

Perceived needed support provider

 None

35

20.5

45

20.1

80

20.3

0.93*

 Health workers at MMT facility

77

45.0

67

29.9

144

36.5

< 0.01*

 Other health workers

9

5.3

7

3.1

16

4.1

0.27*

 Relatives in family

131

76.6

176

78.6

307

77.7

0.64*

 Peer in MMT

26

15.2

27

12.1

53

13.4

0.36*

 Neighbors/other acquaintances

10

5.9

7

3.1

17

4.3

0.19*

Perceived most needed support provider

 None

46

26.9

53

23.7

99

25.1

0.46*

 Health workers

125

73.1

171

76.3

296

74.9

 

Perceived most effective type of support

 Self-timer (clock, phone, etc.)

19

11.1

39

17.4

58

14.7

< 0.01*

 Relatives support

2

1.2

20

8.9

22

5.6

 

 Remember by yourself

144

84.2

145

64.7

289

73.2

 

 Other

6

3.5

20

8.9

26

6.6

 

Perceived additional type of support to improve MMT adherence

 None

140

81.9

157

70.1

297

75.2

0.01*

 Methods to improve treatment

3

1.8

14

6.25

17

4.3

0.03*

 Job search guidelines

10

5.9

18

8.0

28

7.1

0.40*

 Financial support

26

15.2

50

22.3

76

19.2

0.08*

  1. *Chi square test, ¢Fisher exact test