Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparisons of the intervention and comparison groups at baseline

From: Evaluation of the effects of a designated program on illegal drug cessation among adolescents who experiment with drugs

Characteristics

Intervention

(n = 43)

Comparison

(n = 41)

t/χ2

p value

Age (years)

17.14 ± 0.91

17.43 ± 0.14

t = 2.11

0.15

Gender

  

χ2 = 0.34

0.56

 Male

29 (67.44)

31 (75.61)

  

 Female

14 (32.56)

10 (24.39)

  

Work status of main guardian

  

χ2 = 0.03

0.86

 Employed

34 (79.07)

34 (82.93)

  

 Unemployed

9 (20.93)

7 (17.07)

  

Years of education of main guardian

  

χ2 = 0.86

0.36

  ≤ 9 years

12 (27.91)

7 (17.07)

  

 >9 years

31 (72.09)

34 (82.93)

  

Household status

  

χ2 = 0.92

0.34

 Live with both parents

27 (62.79)

30 (75.00)

  

 Others

16 (37.21)

10 (25.00)

  

Religious belief a

  

χ2 = 0.31

0.58

 Yes

18 (43.90)

21 (52.50)

  

 No

23 (56.10)

19 (47.50)

  

Illicit drug use among peers

  

χ2 = 1.14

0.29

 Yes

29 (67.44)

22 (53.66)

  

 No

14 (32.56)

19 (46.34)

  

Outcome measures at baselineb

  

T2 = 8.00

(F = 1.50)

0.20

 Stress management

32.29 ± 5.49

33.02 ± 5.47

  

 Refusal skills

26.00 ± 4.32

26.52 ± 4.11

  

 Pros of drug use

21.63 ± 10.37

18.82 ± 12.81

  

 Cons of drug use

37.67 ± 9.00

36.53 ± 12.17

  

 Drug use resistance self-efficacy

31.55 ± 5.51

34.14 ± 4.01

  
  1. Data of participants’ characteristics are presented as mean, standard deviation, or number (percent) and were compared by an independent two-sample t-test or the chi-square test with Yates correction
  2. aNot all students provided complete answers
  3. bDifferences of outcome measures between groups at baseline were compared by Hotelling’s T2