Skip to main content

Table 3 Multilevel Oaxaca–blinder decomposition of differences for Mexican Americans and non-latino whites in treatment completion

From: Identifying and reducing disparities in successful addiction treatment completion: testing the role of Medicaid payment acceptance

 

b

SE

95% CI

p

Overall

 Mexican American

0.175

0.022

0.132, 0.218

< .001

 White

0.144

0.026

0.093, 0.196

< .001

 Difference

0.031

0.021

−0.012, 0.073

.154

 Explained

0.069

0.019

0.031, 0.106

< .001

 Unexplained

−0.038

0.014

−0.066, −0.010

.009

Program variables

 Wave 2a

−0.002

0.002

−0.006, 0.003

.492

 Medicaid payment

0.013

0.005

0.003, 0.023

.009

 Licensed

0.000

0.001

−0.001, 0.002

.669

 Accreditedb

−0.001

0.006

−0.012, 0.010

.857

Cross-level interaction

 Wave × Mexican American

0.008

0.007

−0.005, 0.021

.230

 Medicaid × Mexican American

0.015

0.008

−0.001, 0.032

.065

Client variables

 Female

0.000

0.000

0.000, 0.001

.458

 Age

−0.003

0.002

−0.006, 0.001

.147

 Education level

0.000

0.002

−0.005, 0.004

.843

Primary drugc

 Alcohol

−0.005

0.001

−0.008, −0.002

< .001

 Methamphetamine

0.009

0.003

0.004, 0.015

.001

 Marijuana or hashish

0.005

0.002

0.002, 0.008

.003

 Other

−0.003

0.001

−0.005, −0.002

< .001

 Days usedd

0.025

0.010

0.006, 0.044

.012

Age at first use

0.000

0.001

−0.001, 0.002

.714

Medicaid eligibility

−0.001

0.002

−0.004, 0.002

.345

Mental health disorder

0.005

0.002

0.002, 0.009

.006

Treatment typee

    

Methadone

−0.003

0.003

−0.009, 0.003

.296

Residential

0.005

0.004

−0.002, 0.013

.154

  1. aWave 1 (2011) used as reference
  2. bAccreditation by the Joint Commission
  3. cHeroin used as reference
  4. dDuring 30 days prior to admission
  5. eOutpatient used as reference
  6. The 1.1% disparity is explained by differences in programs accepting Medicaid payments, professional accreditation, client Medicaid eligibility and treatment type, and differences unexplained by model covariates