Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of effects in situations of conflicting norms

From: Parents’ and peers’ normative influence on adolescents’ smoking: results from a Swiss-Italian sample of middle schools students

   

Non-smokers with smoking experience

Light smokers

Heavy smokers

   

B

Std. Error

p

Odds

B

Std. Error

p

Odds

B

Std. Error

p

Odds

Within norms conflict between referents

Peers smoke, parents do not smoke

vs

Parents and peers do not smoke

2.179

.187

.000

8.835

2.997

.513

.000

20.025

3.131

.590

.000

22.893

Peers do not smoke, parents smoke

 

Parents and peers do not smoke

.743

.240

.002

2.103

.264

.765

.731

1.302

-.555

1.156

.631

.574

Peers and parents smoke

 

Parents and peers do not smoke

2.745

.187

.000

15.570

3.562

.512

.000

35.228

4.307

.585

.000

74.208

Peers approve, parents do not approve

 

Parents and peers do not approve

.465

.236

.049

1.592

.390

.409

.340

1.478

1.534

.255

.000

4.638

Between norms conflict within one referent

Peers approve and smoke

 

Peers do not approve and do not smoke

2.504

.269

.000

12.236

3.509

.553

.000

33.404

5.387

.557

.000

218.530

Peers do not approve and smoke

  

2.105

.129

.000

8.210

3.128

.387

.000

22.837

3.870

.506

.000

47.945

Peers approve and do not smoke

  

1.184

.782

.059

4.392

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

  1. Show results of a first multinomial logistic regression with a model interaction that compare the conflictual situations of the two referent groups within one type of norm, and of a second multinomial logistic regression that compare the influence of two types of norms within one type of referent