Table 1 Comparison of anti-doping prevention work in schools between 2008 and 2011 (N = 22)
From: National doping prevention guidelines: Intent, efficacy and lessons learned - A 4-year evaluation
Question in Questionnaire | Yes answers 2008 in % | Yes answers in 2011 in % | McNemar Test on difference |
|---|---|---|---|
Is the anti-doping subject incorporated in the school’s curriculum? | 64 | 82 | 0.38 |
Doping activities in school are directed toward students | 40 | 27 | 1.0 |
Doping activities in school are directed toward parents | 33 | 33 | 1.0 |
Educational anti-doping work in school is directed toward imparting knowledge about ethical aspects of doping | 93 | 94 | 1.0 |
Educational anti-doping work in school is directed toward imparting knowledge about health consequences of doping | 93 | 81 | 0.25 |
Educational anti-doping work in school is directed toward imparting knowledge about pharmaceuticals, medications and methods | 86 | 81 | 1.0 |
Does the school use new developed teaching documents for doping prevention work in grade 11? | 41 | 79 | 0.06 |
Does the school use web based educational material for doping prevention work in grade 11? | 63 | 21 | 0.13 |