Table 1 Show rates for clients after IRS or assessment
Authors & date | # of agencies | Enrollment stage | Sample size | Showed% | No-showed% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Longhi et al., 1991[17] | Multiple | IRS | 1567 | 71% | 29% |
Fehr et al., 1992[1] | 1 | IRS | 505 | 37% | 63% |
Festinger et al., 1995[18] | 1 | IRS | 235 | 42% | 58% |
Sequeland et al., 2002*[2] | 4 | IRS | 1777 | 53% | 47% |
Chawdhary et al., 2007*[19] | 1 | IRS | 883 | 42% | 58% |
IRS weighted mean | 54% | 46% | |||
IRS un-weighted mean | 49% | 51% | |||
Longhi et al., 1991[17] | Multiple | Assessment | 909 | 66% | 34% |
Kleinman et al., 1992*[20] | 1 | Assessment | 148 | 58% | 42% |
Gottheil et al., 1994[21] | 1 | Assessment | 634 | 80% | 20% |
Ershoff et al., 1996[22] | 8 | Assessment | 1986 | 80% | 20% |
Rohrer et al., 1996[23] | Multiple | Assessment | 17,874 | 45% | 55% |
Vendetti et al., 1997*[24] | 3 | Assessment | 813 | 55% | 45% |
Hser et al., 1998[25] | Multiple | Assessment | 276 | 62% | 38% |
Pena et al., 1999*[26] | 1 | Assessment | 294 | 82% | 18% |
Weisner et al., 2001[27] | 1 | Assessment | 1204 | 76% | 24% |
Arfken et al., 2001[28] | 1 | Assessment | 2471 | 82% | 18% |
Donovan et al., 2001*[29] | Multiple | Assessment | 654 | 71% | 29% |
Claus & Kindleberger, 2002[30] | 1 | Assessment | 260 | 75% | 25% |
Parker et al., 2002[31] | 1 | Assessment | 127 | 49% | 51% |
Angarita et al., 2007*![32] | Multiple | Assessment | 372 | 56% | 44% |
Pinto et al., 2011*[33] | 7 | Assessment | 286 | 70% | 30% |
Resko & Mendoza, 2012*[34] | 7 | Assessment | 340 | 82% | 18% |
Molfenter, 2013+[35] | 67 | Assessment | ? | 63% | 37% |
Pena et al., 1999 (lit review)[26] | 22 studies | Assessment | ? | 73% | 27% |
Assessment weighted mean | 56% | 44% | |||
Assessment un-weighted mean | 67% | 33% | |||