Skip to main content

Table 2 Bivariate analysis of the association between predictors and support for harm reduction programs in British Columbia (n = 1834)

From: A cross-sectional study of public attitudes towards safer drug use practices in British Columbia, Canada

Variable

Totals (Freq%)

Harm reduction programs

 

Support

Oppose

p-value*

(n = 1393)

(n = 441)

Sex n (%)

   

0.001

 Female

981 (53.5)

776 (79.1%)

205 (20.9%)

 Male

853 (46.5)

617 (72.3%)

236 (27.7%)

Age

   

0.023

 19 – 34

335 (18.5)

269 (80.3%)

66 (19.7%)

 35 – 54

851 (46.4)

653 (76.7%)

198 (23.3%)

 55+

648 (35.3)

471 (72.7%)

177 (27.3%)

Education n (%)

   

<0.001

 < High school graduation

138 (7.5)

95 (68.8%)

43 (31.2%)

 = High school

320 (17.4)

223 (69.7%)

97 (30.3%)

 = Some post secondary

321 (509)

252 (78.5%)

69 (21.5%)

 = Certificate/ diploma program

546 (39.8)

379 (69.4%)

130 (23.8%)

 = University graduate

546 (29.8)

444 (81.3%)

102 (18.7%)

Health authority n (%)

   

0.009

 VCH

372 (20.3)

294 (79.0%)

78 (21.0%)

 IH

364 (19.8)

279 (76.6%)

85 (23.4%)

 FH

365 (19.9)

251 (68.8%)

114 (31.2%)

 VIHA

368 (20.1)

287 (78.0%)

81 (22.0%)

 NH

365 (19.9)

282 (77.3%)

83 (22.7%)

  1. *p-values from conventional χ2-tests for association between categorical variables.
  2. In this summary, support includes ‘support’ and ‘strongly support’ responses and oppose includes ‘neutral’, ‘oppose’ and ‘strongly oppose’ responses.