Skip to main content

Table 2 Changes in DAT outcomes by gang membership

From: Drug use and treatment success among gang and non-gang members in El Salvador: a prospective cohort study

 

Past month any illegal substance use

Frequency of past month binge drinking

Past month crime

Past 6 mo. gang risk activity

 

t

OR

t

r

t

OR

t

r

Intercept

1.65

2.99

5.83**

.81

2.60*

5.68

11.20**

.94

Inv. Mills

−2.32*

.37

−1.75+

-.07

−2.70**

.33

−2.91**

-.12

Gang Membership

3.20**

3.53

-.12

.00

3.11**

3.76

11.98**

.43

Time

−6.21**

.10

−5.56**

-.17

−6.55**

.07

−13.06**

-.37

Interaction

−1.11

.67

1.55

.05

−2.41*

.37

−6.77**

-.20

 

χ2

ICC

χ2

ICC

χ2

ICC

χ2

ICC

Repeated Observation Variance

664.56*

.16

723.99**

.08

625.12

.09

1319.41**

.40

Center Variance

57.18**

.09

46.92**

.03

43.39**

.05

24.90

.01

  1. ** p < .01, * p < .05, + p < .10; N = 625; t-tests are based on 18 df for the intercept, 622 df for the inverse Mill’s ratio and the gang membership main effect, and 1068 df for time and the interaction; effect size r calculated using the formula reported in Cohen [26]: r = [ t2 / ( t2 + df ) ].5.