Underage alcohol policies across 50 California cities: an assessment of best practices

Table 9 Testing the data: bar density as a function of window advertising policy

Model	Unstandardized coefficients		Standardized coefficients	t	Sig.
Model	B	Std. Error	Beta	t	Sig.
(Constant)	.106	.053		2.017	.050
Window Advertising Total	.012	.004	.423	3.035	.004
PER CAPITA 2008–10	.020	.012	.221	1.699	.097
Totalpop	−1.807E-8	.000	−.041	−.291	.773
PctWhite	.006	.031	.029	.199	.844
Median HH income	−7.975E-7	.000	−.322	−1.577	.122
Percentage of unemployees (both males and females) (unemployed/labor force)	−.414	.285	−.318	−1.451	.154

R² = .28.
Dependent Variable = Bar density.
Independent Variables = Per capita enforcement funds from 2008–2011; total population, percentage white residents, median household income, and employment levels of cities.

ISSN: 1747-597X