Skip to main content

Table 3 Multivariate Regression of Chronic Disease on Addiction Treatment Utilization (N = 498)

From: Chronic disease and recent addiction treatment utilization among alcohol and drug dependent adults

 

Model 1

Model 2

Model 3

 

Any Addiction Treatment

Outpatient Days

Residential Nights

Independent Variable

AOR (95% CI)

IRR (95% CI)

IRR (95% CI)

Chronic disease (Katz)

   

   None

Referent

Referent

Referent

   One, of lower severity only

0.88 (0.60, 1.28)

0.86 (0.41, 1.81)

0.68 (0.31, 1.49)

   One of higher severity or multiple conditions

1.29 (0.89, 1.88)

1.14 (0.55, 2.38)

0.63 (0.23, 1.69)

Age

0.99 (0.98, 1.01)

1.00 (0.97, 1.04)

0.99 (0.96, 1.03)

Female

1.23 (0.89, 1.70)

1.74 (0.95, 3.20)

0.68 (0.31, 1.48)

Race

   

   Black

0.57 (0.38, 0.85)**

0.47 (0.21, 1.05)

0.22 (0.08, 0.64)**

   Hispanic

0.77 (0.49, 1.20)

1.34 (0.62, 2.89)

0.55 (0.22, 1.36)

   Other

0.61 (0.32, 1.15)

0.75 (0.22, 2.57)

0.77 (0.27, 2.24)

   White

Referent

Referent

Referent

Substance dependence

   

   Alcohol dependent & recent heavy use

0.80 (0.52, 1.24)

0.78 (0.33, 1.83)

1.13 (0.50, 2.57)

   Drug dependent & recent use

0.86 (0.61, 1.22)

0.87 (0.39, 1.95)

0.48 (0.21, 1.11)

   Both

Referent

Referent

Referent

Recruitment site

   

   Detoxification program

0.82 (0.57, 1.17)

0.37 (0.19, 0.73)**

1.11 (0.48, 2.57)

   Other

Referent

Referent

Referent

Criminal justice involvement (past 3 mo)

0.98 (0.73, 1.31)

1.26 (0.70, 2.27)

1.20 (0.66, 2.18)

Homeless (past 3 mo)

1.07 (0.80, 1.43)

0.95 (0.53, 1.72)

1.06 (0.58, 1.95)

Unemployed (past 3 mo)

1.07 (0.79, 1.45)

1.60 (0.79, 3.24)

0.85 (0.47, 1.54)

Health insurance

2.04 (1.24, 3.36)**

3.06 (0.88, 10.68)

2.54 (0.96, 6.71)

Current smoker

0.89 (0.61, 1.30)

0.79 (0.34, 1.81)

1.48 (0.53, 4.11)

Anxiety (Beck)

   

   Low

Referent

Referent

Referent

   Moderate

1.45 (0.99, 2.14)

1.71 (0.80, 3.66)

2.15 (0.97, 4.75)

   Severe

1.77 (1.23, 2.53)**

2.12 (1.02, 4.41)*

2.11 (0.94, 4.75)

  1. Model 1 used logistic regression; Models 2 and 3 used Poisson regression.
  2. *p < .05 **p < .01; Wald chi-square tests, df = 1