Table 3 Studies comparing integrated to non-integrated treatment
Study | n | Groups | Design | Measure | d (SE) | p | Study Quality |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Barkauskas and Low46 | Treatment: 52 Control: 73 | Residential program for pregnant, incarcerated women vs standard prison care for women | Quasi- Experimental | % positive toxicology screens | -0.29†(0.69) | 0.669 | 5/9 |
Carroll and Chang 40 | Treatment: 7 Control: 7 | Enhanced methadone treatment for women vs standard methadone treatment for women | Randomized Trial | % positive toxicology screens | -0.14†(0.67) | 0.83 | 1/5 |
Chang and Carroll 47 | Treatment: 6 Control: 6 | Enhanced methadone treatment for women vs standard methadone treatment for women | Quasi- experimental | % positive toxicology screens | 0.43†(0.70) | 0.54 | 3/9 |
Gwadz and Leonard39 | Treatment: 51 Control: 58 | Integrated outpatient treatment for women vs standard outpatient treatment for women | Randomized Trial | National Alcohol Survey - Frequency of Alcohol Use | -0.12 (0.19) | 0.545 | 1/5 |
Drug Use Screen Inventory - Alcohol/Dru g Problems | 0.077 (0.19) | 0.69 | |||||
Risk Behaviour Assessment - Frequency of Drug Use | -0.26 (0.19) | 0.183 | |||||
Harshman66 | Treatment: 25 Control: 27 | Residential Integrated treatment for women vs Co-ed Residential Standard treatment | Quasi- experimental | # months since last used substances | -0.15 (0.28) | 0.593 | 2/9 |
SASSI-2 * Alcohol use | 0.61 (0.28) | .033 | |||||
SASSI-2 drug use | 0.06 (0.28) | 0.83 | |||||
Luthar et al. 41 | Treatment: 60 Control: 67 | Maternal psychotherapy plus standard methadone treatment vs. Recovery training plus standard methadone treatment | Randomized Trial | Positive toxicology screens - opiate use (follow up phase - up to one year follow up) | -0.08†(0.18) | 0.647 | 3/9 |
Positive toxicology screens - cocaine use (treatment phase) | 0.25 (0.18) | 0.170 | |||||
Positive toxicology screens - cocaine use (follow up phase - up to one year follow up) | -0.14 †(0.18) | 0.428 | |||||
Sacks and Sacks 67 | Treatment: 49 Control: 49 | Residential integrated treatment for women vs co-ed standard residential treatment | Quasi- experimental | Substance Use Composite (incl. Drug use, frequency of use, # days of use) | 0.12â—Š | NS | 3/9 |
Sowers and Ellis48 | Treatment: 26 Control: 15 | Residential integrated treatment for women vs standard day treatment (not specified if women only) | Quasi- experimental | % not using any substances | 0.33 (0.36) | 0.36 | 4/9 |
Suchman and Mayes 49 | treatment: 25 control: 23 | Women only outpatient treatment with parenting intervention vs standard women only outpatient treatment | Quasi- Experimental | % not using any substances | 0.15 (0.30) | 0.628 | 3/9 |
Touissaint and VanDeMar k68 | Treatment: 64 Control: 106 | Residential Integrated Treatment for women vs Co-ed Residential Standard Treatment | Quasi- experimental | Addiction Severity Index Drug Composite | 0.30 (0.16) | .059 | 6/9 |
Addiction Severity Index Alcohol Composite | 0.28 (0.16) | 0.078 | 6/9 |